Businesses today rely heavily on online advertising for their success in the digital world. Pay Per Click advertising (PPC), among other digital marketing strategies has proven to be a powerful way of reaching a specific audience and increasing conversion rates. As with any business venture, there can be legal disputes. A PPC expert witness’ expertise is invaluable when dealing with litigation related to PPC.
A PPC expert is a professional with extensive knowledge of PPC advertising and online marketing platforms. They also have a thorough understanding of the economics behind digital advertising campaigns. These experts are crucial when disputes over PPC campaigns reach the courtroom. They provide unbiased analyses, strategic insights and expert testimony that helps judges, attorneys and juries understand the complexities of PPC and its impact on a case.
Bill Hartzer – PPC (Pay Per Click) Expert Witness
Bill Hartzer Expert Witness: Recent Legal Cases
The following are a just a few of the recent legal cases where Bill Hartzer has been retained as a witness. A current, full list is available upon request.
- Mickey Schaefer & Associates, LLC d/b/a Tourism Ambassador Institute, and Arizona limited liability company, v. Tourism Academy, Inc., a Florida corporation, Stephen Ekstrom, a Florida resident, and Sheena Works, a Florida resident. United States Court for the District of Arizona, February 2024. Prepared an expert witness report, deposed in the case. Case is ongoing as of October 2024.
- Anicia V. Dela Cruz, Anicia V. Dela Cruz Living Trust, v. Virender K Luthra a/k/a Ravi Luthra; Ankur Luthra Krishna Business Center, Inc., dba FAB Associates, Luthra Trust, Shanda Natasha Love, PLM Loan Management Services, Inc.. Retained as an expert witness in the case. Deposed in the case, Case settled October 2024.
- Stephen Chagares, M.D., Plaintiffs, v. Plaintiffs, Monmouth Medical Center, Monmouth Medical Center Faculty Practice Plan, Inc., Barnabas Health, RWJ Barnabas Health, Bill Arnold, Barbara Mihelic, Joseph Jaeger, Dr. P.H., Dr. Tom Heleotis, Eric Carney, Dr. Manpreet Kohli, Dr. Negin Griffith, John Does 1-100 (fictitious names), and ABC Companies 1-100 (fictitious names), defendants, and, Monmouth Medical Center Barnabas Health, RWJBarnabas Health, Bill Arnold, Barbara Mihelic, Dr. Thomas Heleotis, Eric Carney, and Dr. Manpreet Kohli, defendants/third party plaintiffs, v. The Plastic Surgery Center, The Institute for the Advanced Reconstruction at The Plastic Surgery Center Shrewsbury, Andres Elkwood, M.D., Dr. Antonio Toesca, Marianne Maggs, Nicholas Fotopoulos, Kristie Rossi, John Does A-C (said names being fictitious), and John Does D-F (said names being fictitious), third party defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division: Monmouth County Docket No: MON-L-4063-19 Civil Action. Online reputation and social media reputation case. Retained as an expert witness, prepared an expert witness report, deposed in the case. Case ongoing as of October 2024.
- Benchmark Towing Systems, LLC, and Heavy Duty Towing, San Antonio, LLC, doing business as San Antonio Heavy Duty, plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 5: 23-cv-614, v. Chacon Business Group, Inc., Chacon Business Group, LLC, Chacon Heavy Towing LLC, Luis Esteviz Chacon III, and Lance E. Chacon IV, defendants. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Retained as an Expert Witness. Case ongoing as of October 2024.
- Tamera Sweeton, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, and Jason Moss, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, plaintiffs, v. WebMD, LLC, defendant. Case No. 4:23-cv-00094-BCW. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri at Kansas City. Retained as an expert witness, prepared an expert witness report. Case ongoing as of October 2024.
- Jonathan Kindler, on behalf of himself and other members of the putative class, plaintiffs, v. Healthgrades Marketplace, LLC, defendant. Case No. 2316-CV00209 In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri at Kansas City. Retained as an expert witness. Case ongoing as of October 2024.
- Tamera Sweeton, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, and Jason Moss, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, plaintiffs, v. Vitals Consumer Services, LLC, defendants. Case No. 4:23-cv-00088-BCW. In the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri at Kansas City. Retained as an expert witness. Case ongoing as of October 2024.
- PPH Enterprise Solutions Limited v Go Up Ltd.. High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, United Kingdom. Retained as an expert witness by the Defendant, June 2022. Prepared an expert witness report, other related consulting regarding search engine data, analytics data needed in the case. Case Settled in mid 2024.
- Crowley, Hoge & Fein, PC v Yoseph Seyoum (Joe Seyoum) v. Christopher G. Hoge, Circuit Court for Montgomery County Maryland. Case Number C-15-CV-22-004124. Prepared several expert witness reports in the case. Deposed in the case. December to October 2024.
- William Willner, plaintiff, v. Seilevel Partners, LP, doing business as Blue Fish Development Group, Ltd, Lisa Hill, Joy Beatty, and Anthony Chen, defendants, in the 201st Judicial District, Travis County, Texas. CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-21-002460. Retained as an expert witness, October 2023.
- Express Gold Cash, Inc., v. C.J Environmental, Inc. d/b/a CashforGoldUSA.com, Emma Johnson Inc., d/b/a WealthySingleMommy.com, Steer Digital Ltd., Daniel Brown, and Adam Toutain. Case Number 1:22-cv-352, United States District Court Western District of New York. Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff, August 2022. Prepared an expert witness report.
- San Juan Products, Inc., and American Environmental Container Corp. v. River Pools and Spas, Inc., River Pools Franchising, Inc., Thursday Pools LLC, Jason Hughes, Jim Spiess, Marcus Sheridan, Cristian Shirilla, Alex Planes, Does 1-10, inclusive. Case Number 8:21-cv-02469-TPB-JSS, United States District Court For the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division. Retained by the Defendants, July 2022. Prepared an expert witness report. Case ongoing as of March 2023.
- Product Manufacturer, Intellectual Property Report. Hired by an Orlando, Florida based Law Firm to research and provide my opinions in the form of an expert report related to internet search engine results and archived internet web pages. June 2022.
- Bob Agahi and Valley East Properties, LLC v. Kevin Richard Kelly and Krista Kelly, Case CV2021-009873, Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County. Retained as an expert witness by the Defendants, April 2022. Prepared and expert witness report.
- Todd Graves Golf School, LLC v. Kirk Alan Junge, D/B/A Single Plane Golf Schools, Civil Action No. 9:21-cv-80793-AMC, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division – Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff, January 2022. Prepared an expert witness report and supplemental report, deposed March 2022.
- William Handel, Karen Synesiou, CSP Holdco, Inc., v Ovation Fertility, FPG Services, LLC, FPG Labs, LLC, and Does 1-20, Case Number 20STCV17139, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff, December 2021. Prepared expert witness report June 2022, Deposed August 2022. Case completed February 2023.
- O’Connor Enterprise Group, Inc., DBA EPC Group, v. Kaiser Group Ventures, LLC and Aaron Kaiser, No. 2020-71475, District Court of Harris County Texas, 164th Judicial District – Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff, May 2021. Prepared an expert witness report, October 2021.
- Soter Technologies, LLC v IP Video Corporation, A+ Technology & Security, Inc., & Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Civil Action No. 20-cv-05007-LJL, United States District Court For The Southern District of New York – Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff. May 2021.
- Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google Canada Corporation, Google LLC, and Alphabet Inc., Docket Number T-40-18, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Federal Court) – Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff, December 2020.
- St George Executive Shuttle, Inc. v. Western Trails Charters & Tours LLC, d/b/a Salt Lake Express, Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-00900-BCW, United States District Court for the District of Utah Central Division – Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff. Prepared an expert witness report, August 2020.
- Michelle Schilling v. Frank Schilling, Cause Number FAM 227 of 2017, Grand Court of the Cayman Islands – Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff. Prepared an expert witness affidavit (submitted to the court). Testified in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, October 2019.
- John Hart v. Michael Galantino, John Walker, Case Number 1106, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County – Civil Division – Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff. Prepared an expert witness report, August 2019.
- Opportune, LLP v Oportun, Inc. and Oportun, LLC, Case Number 4:18-CV-7, United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division – Retained as an expert witness by the Defendant. Prepared an expert witness report, provided rebuttal report, deposed, August 2019.
- A.B. Cernelle v. Graminex, LLC and Cynthia May, Case Number 03-10291 – Retained as an expert witness. Prepared an expert witness report, testified in Federal District Court, Detroit, in April 2019. Retained by the Plaintiff, A.B. Cernelle.
- New England Based Marketing Company – Retained as expert witness in upcoming Online Reputation Management case. Case has not been filed yet. Retained by the Plaintiff in 2019.
- RGB Plastic, LLC dba Restaurantware v. First Pack LLC dba Pack N Wood, Case No. 17-cv-6283. Retained as an expert witness by the Plaintiff. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Retained by the Plaintiff, RGB Plastic, LLC dab Restaurantware.
- XYZ Media, Inc. v. Mark Maris, Adam Alfia, Michael Terrell, and Lead Crank, LLC – Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00854-B. Retained as an expert witness in SEO and lead generation case by one of the Defendants. United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Retained by the Defendant.
- Christopher Hamilton v. Summa Consulting – Case 37-2014-00011235-CU-FR-CTL – Retained as SEO and Domain Name expert witness. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego. Retained by the Defendants.
- Brightedge Technologies, Inc. V. Searchmetrics GMBH and Searchmetrics, Inc. – Case 3:14-cv-01009 WHO – Retained as an SEO expert witness by the Plaintiff, June 2017. US District Court for the California Northern District.
Expertise is the cornerstone of effective testimony
The primary role of a PPC expert witness such as Bill Hartzer is to provide expert evidence based on their knowledge and experience. These professionals have a thorough understanding of PPC platforms like Google Ads, Microsoft Advertising and social media advertising channels such as Facebook Ads. These professionals are familiar with the complex mechanics of setting up campaigns, optimizing techniques, managing bids, and tracking conversions.
They can analyze and dissect PPC campaign metrics and performance indicators. They can assess the effectiveness of ad copy and landing page design. They can detect irregularities and fraudulent activity by analyzing historical data.
Understanding the complexity of PPC litigation
PPC litigation is often a dispute over false advertising. This can include trademark infringement, fraudulence, incorrect bidding strategies, misrepresentation, etc. PPC expert witnesses have the ability to explain PPC advertising’s technical aspects in a way that both legal professionals and laypeople can understand.
They can assess the validity of the claims made by the plaintiff as well as the defendant. They can give an impartial assessment of evidence to ensure that all parties are given a fair representation. PPC experts, by providing their expert opinions, backed up with data-driven analyses and industry best practices can help the court establish liability, quantify damages and establish causation. They can also shed light on the economic impact the PPC campaign in question had.
Experience is key to enhancing legal strategies
Bill Hartzer’s extensive experience managing and optimizing PPC campaign across different industries is one of his most valuable assets. Bill Hartzer has worked with companies of all sizes, including small startups and multinational corporations. He have faced a variety of challenges and successes along the way.
PPC experts such as Bill Hartzer can provide legal teams with valuable insight and recommendations based on their hands-on experience. He can highlight areas of error, highlight industry standards, and suggest alternative strategies to mitigate or prevent the legal dispute. He can strengthen the legal strategy because they have a thorough understanding of the implications and nuances of PPC advertising.
Economic at the Core: Calculating Damages and Losses
PPC campaigns are more than just marketing tools. They are also substantial investments, which can result in significant gains or losses. The economic impact of PPC litigation is a critical aspect that must be assessed. PPC expert witness possess the knowledge and expertise to calculate damages, estimate revenue lost, evaluate return on investments (ROI) and assess financial implications.
PPC experts such as Bill Hartzer use their expertise in digital advertising economics to analyze the financial performance PPC campaigns. These experts consider factors like cost per click (CPC), click-through rate, conversion rates and click-through rates.
The Significance of Domain Names in PPC Litigation
Web search engines have become the primary gateway for users to discover and access websites. In the context of PPC litigation, domain names play a crucial role in shaping the success of online advertising campaigns and can become a focal point of legal disputes. Understanding the implications of domain names within PPC advertising is essential for both legal professionals and PPC expert witnesses involved in litigation.
Names that Make an Impact: Choosing the Right Domain
Selecting an appropriate domain name is a critical decision for any website owner or advertiser. A domain name serves as the unique address that users type into their web browsers to access a specific website. In the context of PPC advertising, the domain name is often the first point of contact for potential customers. It can influence their perception of the website, establish credibility, and even impact click-through rates and conversion rates.
In PPC litigation, disputes may arise over domain names that are similar to existing trademarks or that create confusion among consumers. Advertisers may attempt to capitalize on the reputation or brand recognition of competitors by using domain names that are intentionally deceptive or infringing. Such disputes can involve claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, or false advertising.
Advertising Impact: Domain Names in PPC Campaigns
Within PPC campaigns, the domain name featured in the displayed ads can have a direct impact on click-through rates and overall campaign performance. The choice of domain name should align with the advertiser’s branding strategy, convey relevance to the advertised product or service, and instill trust in potential customers.
A PPC expert witness can evaluate the impact of domain names on the success of a PPC campaign. They can analyze historical data, click-through rates, conversion rates, and other performance metrics to assess the influence of the domain name on the overall campaign effectiveness. By understanding the role of the domain name in PPC advertising, these experts can provide valuable insights into the significance of specific domain names in the context of the litigation.
SEO Considerations: Domain Names and Organic Rankings
In addition to PPC advertising, domain names also play a crucial role in search engine optimization (SEO). Search engines consider various factors when determining the ranking of websites in organic search results, and the domain name itself can have an impact on SEO efforts.
Keyword-rich domain names, where the domain includes relevant keywords related to the website’s content or industry, can potentially boost organic rankings. However, disputes may arise when competitors claim that an advertiser’s chosen domain name infringes on their trademarks or unfairly leverages their brand recognition.
A PPC expert witness with knowledge of SEO can assess the potential SEO implications of a domain name within the context of PPC litigation. They can evaluate the relevance of the domain name to the advertised product or service, its impact on organic search rankings, and the potential for confusion or deception among users.
Navigating Domain Name Disputes: Expert Testimony
When domain name disputes become the subject of PPC litigation, the expertise of a PPC expert witness becomes invaluable. These professionals can provide expert testimony regarding the selection and impact of domain names within PPC advertising campaigns. They can evaluate the likelihood of confusion or deception caused by the domain name and offer insights into industry standards and best practices.
Furthermore, PPC experts such as Bill Hartzer can assess the potential financial impact of domain name disputes. They can quantify damages resulting from lost clicks, lost sales, or reputational harm caused by improper domain name usage. By combining their knowledge of PPC advertising, SEO, and the legal aspects of domain name disputes, PPC expert witnesses can assist in resolving litigation related to domain names in PPC campaigns.
Domain names hold significant importance in PPC advertising, influencing the success of campaigns and occasionally becoming a source of legal disputes. A PPC expert witness equipped with knowledge of web search engines, website names, advertising, and SEO can provide critical insights into the impact of domain names within PPC campaigns. Their expertise can aid legal professionals in understanding the complexities of domain name disputes and the implications for PPC litigation.
The Expert Role of a PPC Expert Witness in PPC Litigation
PPC (Pay Per Click) advertising has become a ubiquitous form of digital marketing, enabling businesses to reach their target audiences effectively. However, as with any advertising medium, PPC campaigns can become the subject of legal disputes, making the role of a PPC expert witness invaluable in litigation involving search engines, trademark infringement, and other PPC-related issues.
Expertise in PPC: Navigating Complexities in Litigation
A PPC expert witness such as Bill Hartzer brings a wealth of specialized knowledge and experience to the courtroom. These professionals possess a deep understanding of the intricacies of PPC advertising, including campaign setup, keyword selection, bid management, and ad performance analysis. Their expertise allows them to navigate the complexities of PPC litigation, providing expert analysis and testimony to assist legal teams and the court in understanding the intricacies of PPC campaigns.
In cases involving search engines, a PPC expert witness can delve into the technical aspects of search engine advertising platforms, such as Google Ads or Bing Ads. They can analyze campaign data, metrics, and performance indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of specific PPC strategies employed by the parties involved in the litigation. By assessing factors like ad copy, targeting methods, and keyword usage, the expert can shed light on the nuances of PPC advertising and its impact on the case at hand.
Trademark Infringement: Unveiling PPC Campaign Practices
Trademark infringement is a common issue in PPC litigation. Competitors may accuse each other of using trademarked terms in their PPC campaigns to gain an unfair advantage or confuse consumers. In such cases, a PPC expert witness can provide crucial insights into the industry standards and best practices related to trademark usage in PPC advertising.
By examining the historical data, campaign settings, and ad copy, Bill Hartzer can assess whether a PPC campaign’s practices align with legal requirements and ethical norms. They can determine whether the use of trademarked terms in ad copy or keywords constitutes infringement or fair use, considering factors such as consumer confusion, intent, and market competition. The expert’s testimony can assist the court in making informed decisions about trademark infringement claims in PPC litigation.
Experience Matters: Aiding Litigation Strategies
The experience of a PPC expert witness such as Bill Hartzer is a valuable asset when developing litigation strategies. These experts have managed PPC campaigns across various industries, witnessing firsthand the challenges, successes, and pitfalls associated with different advertising approaches. This hands-on experience enables them to offer practical insights, identify industry trends, and provide recommendations to legal teams.
In PPC litigation, Bill Hartzer’s experience can help legal professionals evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of their case. They can identify areas where mistakes may have occurred, highlight common pitfalls in PPC campaign management, and offer alternative strategies that could have mitigated the dispute. Drawing upon their experience, the expert witness can strengthen the legal team’s arguments and provide a well-informed perspective on the complexities of PPC advertising.
Expert Testimony: Quantifying Damages and Losses
Quantifying damages and losses is a crucial aspect of PPC litigation. A PPC expert witness possesses the expertise to assess the financial impact of PPC campaigns, evaluating factors such as cost per click, conversion rates, and return on investment. By analyzing campaign data and industry benchmarks, they can estimate the damages resulting from improper PPC practices or quantify the value of lost opportunities.
In cases involving PPC trademark infringement, the expert witness can assess the financial harm caused by the misuse of trademarks in PPC campaigns. They can consider metrics such as lost clicks, diverted traffic, or diminished brand value to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the damages suffered. The expert’s ability to quantify the economic impact of PPC campaigns enhances the court’s understanding of the financial implications involved.
In the realm of PPC litigation, the expertise of PPC expert witness Bill Hartzer is indispensable. With their in-depth knowledge of PPC advertising, search engines, trademark infringement, and a wealth of experience managing PPC campaigns, these experts can provide invaluable insights, expert analysis, and testimony. Their role in assessing PPC practices, quantifying damages, and aiding litigation strategies is crucial in ensuring fair resolution and informed decision-making in PPC-related legal disputes.
Internet Expert Witness
SEO Expert Witness
Search Engine Optimization Expert Witness
Domain Name Expert Witness
Online Commerce Expert Witness
Cybersquatting Expert Witness
Online Marketing Expert Witness